Steply
 Book a briefing
Technology

You do not need to understand the stack. You need to know what it lets you do without us.

A technology list is the most interchangeable page across vendors: everyone uses roughly the same things. What differs is what each choice leaves in your hands when the contract ends. That is why the question below is the only one worth asking.

Evaluate my case See services

The technical question that decides a contract is not about technology.

These three swaps show up in nearly every technical evaluation meeting, and the version on the right is the one that reveals something about the vendor.

"Which technology do you use?"
"Who can maintain this after you?" The honest answer is a list of profiles that exist in the market, not the name of a proprietary framework only three people know.
"Which AI model do you use?"
"Where is my document processed, and what gets recorded about it?" The model changes every six months; where the data flows is an architecture decision, and that one lasts the whole project.
"Do you do monitoring?"
"Can I open that dashboard myself, today, without asking you?" Every vendor monitors something. Few let the client see what they see, including what went wrong.

Eight choices, and what each one costs.

No engineering decision is free. If one looks free, its cost was pushed somewhere else, usually onto the client and usually later. Here every choice comes with the price stated.

Predictability

  • Specification before code

    Every stage starts from a document with a deliverable, verifiable acceptance criteria and the out-of-scope list, written in language both sides can check.

    gives you back
    A date you can hold us to and a "done" that is not the deliverer's opinion.
    costs
    One to two weeks before any running code exists. It is the discomfort of seeing no visible progress right at the start.

  • Tests, versioning and documentation

    Explained architecture, readable commit history, tests on what breaks expensively and documentation that travels with the code instead of becoming a forgotten PDF.

    gives you back
    Another team can pick up where we stopped, with no archaeology.
    costs
    Each stage costs a bit more than shipping only what works in the demo.

  • One codebase for web, mobile and SaaS

    Web system, app and multi-tenant platform come from the same codebase whenever the case allows, instead of three products that diverge in six months.

    gives you back
    One fix lands in all three places, and maintenance cost does not triple.
    costs
    Where a platform demands specific native behavior, one codebase gets in the way, and there we split it, saying why.

Security

  • Local AI model when the data demands it

    For contracts, medical records, payroll and customer bases, the model runs inside your infrastructure or cloud, with the keys in your name. The document does not cross the network to be read.

    gives you back
    No sensitive data becomes third-party training, and the answer to legal is verifiable.
    costs
    Your own setup and hardware, and a local model usually performs below the largest cloud model. When the data is public, we say it is not worth it.

  • Role-based permission and audit trail

    Role-based access control, not a shared password, plus a record of who asked what, when, and whether it was allowed, including what the AI agent read.

    gives you back
    Audit and data protection stop being a separate project, and an incident becomes an investigation instead of a guess.
    costs
    More work on the first stage and some day-to-day friction: whoever lacks the role does not see the data, director or not.

  • Document search with source and permission

    Contracts, policies, manuals and internal bases searchable in natural language, with the answer carrying its source and respecting the asker's permissions.

    gives you back
    A checkable answer: you can open the document and verify, instead of trusting generated text.
    costs
    The answer reads less fluently than a generic chat, and when no source exists the system says it does not know.

Observability

  • Instrumentation from the first deploy

    Availability, response time, error rate, queue and AI cost per query published by the system itself, with alerts landing before the complaint.

    gives you back
    You learn about a problem before the customer does, and you can tie each delivery to a measured effect.
    costs
    A bit more infrastructure running, and uncomfortable numbers becoming visible, ours included.

  • Legacy coexisting, not replaced in one go

    Mainframe, COBOL, Delphi, VB6 and undocumented internal platforms come in through a bridge: the new takes over one piece at a time, with the old running alongside.

    gives you back
    The operation never stops so a vendor can test a hypothesis, and every migrated piece is reversible.
    costs
    A period with two live systems at once, which costs more in the short run than flipping the switch over a weekend.

The right choice depends on your case, not on our preference.

Tell us what kind of data the operation handles and who needs to see what. The combination that makes sense comes out of that, sometimes far simpler than what you imagined hiring.

Evaluate my caseSee services